The day started with a crash of a truck on the A28 at Amersfoort and so a lot of people were late and the seminar started a half a hour later. There were sessions with everyone and there were parallel sessions with customers, consultancy and vendor parties. These are the sessions i attended:
- A textual Database for decision making - Bill Inmon
- Semantic Media Wiki - Mark Greaves
- BI Efficiency - Robert Mansour
- Dataquality - IntoDQ
- Management excelence - Frank Buytendijk
- Real time BI - Intersystems
- Extended BI - Enterprise technology
- How a DWH suppors a transaparant and customer driven organisation - Woonbron
- Saas BI - Rick van der Lans
Bill told about he concepts of a textual datawarehouse and DW2.0. I've never heard Bill speaking and i was quite interested in what he had to tell. Overall it was entertaining to hear him speak but answer on how to do textual stuff were not part of the presentation. That's was a pitty. He sounded a bit grumpy about people who built systems and calls it a 'datawarehouses';-)
Semantic Media Wiki - Mark Greaves
Mark Greaves is of the Vulcan company of Paul Allen and he associated with Bill Gates, and he told quite a technical story about Wiki's and analysis of text.
BI Efficiency - Robert Mansour
Robert is partner of TOPBI and he told an interesting story on how to improve the efficiency of BI projects and administration. He approached this with 3 points of views : Technology, organisation and process. These categories will give you grip on certian aspects of BI and implementation. Quite interesting to see some BI projects from the viewpoint of consultancy company.
Dataquality - IntoDQ
This presentation was a more or less a productpresentation of Trillium tool, a dataquality tool. Nothing to report about this.
Management excellence - Frank Buytendijk
Frank is a good speaker and he entertained the audience with a excellent (!) session. He approaced BI from the point of mananagement decision improvements. Operational processes are described due to many governance programs like SOX. Management processes are rarely described and Frank states that should be more improved by adding more stages in the PDCA cyclus.
Stakeholders like customers and suppliers add value to a organisation but are rarely measured by performance management tooling. He used the example of K-mart. K-mart was very successful in customersatisfaction, employersatisfaction and they had a good prospect. But they were out business when Wall mart beated them. So they had everything on control but forget the external factors.
Extended BI - Enterprise technology
This presentation was more about search technology than it was about BI. A google like search functionality was shown, to search data from the enterprise and it was shown in as in a dashboard. Another demo was about pictures and selecting them based on colors. With a slider you could say more or less red andfor example if you choose more red with the slider, pictures with more red were shown. Nice but how do you link this with a BI solution?
How a DWH suppors a transaparant and customer driven organisation - Woonbron
This was a presentaion about a large housingcooporation. He explained the solution built at Woonbron. An interesting approach on how they built their architecture of information delivery. They also built a data warehouse based on datavault. First they created a logic data model to create a uniform naming convention. For example, There was a discusion about a fysical building and a living unit in tha building. This could 1:1 but also 1:n.
Saas BI - Rick van der Lans
Rick told about BI SAAS. He stated that SAAS BI is something different than an application that you would host in a SAAS cloud and i agree with him. SAAS BI is mostly a project that you should build from scratch and a SAAS Application not. He also told about a vendor lock in principle and there is no standard for switching between parties. He talked about the developments in the IT world like Selfservice BI and SAAS BI. He gave us something to think about: why is the business taking away activities from IT? Is it because they're not satisfied with what we do?
Before answering this question we have to look deeper in this question: What is meant with satisfied? What could be the reason? Quality of service of IT, cost effective, speed of solving issues, liability, etc?
There is a distinction about Selfservice BI and SAAS BI. The emerge of Selfservice BI is about exploding information, faster decision, IT backlog and perhaps it's better to let the user do this kind of stuff. IT can focus on consolidating Selfservice BI solution in the mainstream of a company information strategy. SAAS BI is technical administration move. The user won't get more functionality with SAAS BI. The application is only somewhere else placed. So two different things in my opinion. And they should be treated both in their own way.
An interesting day with high peaks (Frank Buytendijk, Woonbron, TopBI) and some disappointments (Bill Inmon, Intersystems) and some in the middle (Mark Greaves, IntoDQ, Rick van der Lans). But overall it was a day i didn't want to miss.
That's it !